Supply of tyres for vehicles used by the Melilla driving school

Summary

The procurement is for tyres for the vehicles of the ULOG 24 driving school in Melilla, as a single lot with a total value of up to EUR 32,000. The list covers seven sizes: 10 each of 285/70 R19.5, 385/65 R22.5 and 265/70 R19.5; 4 of 16.00R25 TL (28PR); 10 of 14.00-24 TL (16PR) 153A8 TT VE; 5 of 295/80 R22.5 154/150L; and 10 of 225/75 R16C 121/120R 10PR. Deliveries are made against ULOG 24 orders, with no minimum order quantity. Prices must include removal of the used tyre, valve replacement, rim cleaning, fitting the new tyre, inflation and electronic balancing, as well as immediate removal of the old tyre and a waste-management handover certificate. Tyres must be new, no more than 12 months old according to the DOT code at delivery, and comply with EU type-approval and applicable tyre-labelling requirements. Minimum fuel-efficiency, wet-grip and noise ratings are specified for three sizes: 285/70 R19.5 must meet C/B/73 dB; 385/65 R22.5, B/B/72 dB; and 265/70 R19.5, C/B/73 dB. Each has a two-wave noise rating. The technical specifications set load, speed, construction and strength characteristics for the other sizes. No particular brand is mandatory if an equivalent product is suitable for its intended use. Standard orders must be delivered within 48 hours, urgent orders within 24 hours, and very urgent orders at the time of the request. More than five delivery delays may lead to termination. The tender documents give differing contract schedules: 30 days from signature and no later than 1 December 2026 in the administrative terms, while the technical specifications describe order-based performance through 15 December 2026. Check the official tender documents to confirm the applicable schedule. The budget is EUR 32,000, and award scoring is based on price (90%) and warranty duration (10%). A three-year warranty earns 0 points, four years 5 points and five years 10 points. The tender must include an item-by-item price and technical data sheets. The administrative terms state that the technical annex’s unit-price list is erroneous and invalid, so the applicable pricing basis should be confirmed in the official documents.